Mill's insistence upon this imaginary 'plurality of causes'is significant.It indicates the precise stage in the development of the idea of cause to which his doctrine corresponds.Taking what we may call the popular sense of causation,the 'plurality'expresses an obvious truth;and we can understand its plausibility.We take,in fact,two concrete events which follow each other,and call them cause and effect.We use a tool --a knife to cut bread,for example;we are forced to attend to the fact that every difference in the knife will have an effect on the result.The work is better or worse,as the knife is sharper or blunter.If we did not recognise this in every purposeful action,all action would be intrinsically uncertain.We are,therefore,impressed with the necessity of admitting that the effect is determined by the cause.But,on the other hand,the knife is there.It may have been made by fifty different methods,and yet be the same.The handle may have been first made and then the blade,or vice versa,and so forth.therefore we believe,and in this sense of cause believe correctly,that one effect may be the product of any number of different 'causes.'In order to reach the more scientific sense of causation,we have to take into account all that we have neglected.The knife is one product of an indefinite multitude of processes,and is therefore not the total 'effect'of the concrete antecedent,but only a part of it arbitrarily singled out.We do not attend to all these collateral results,because for us at the moment they have no interest;but when we systematically carry out the 'uniformity of nature'principle,it is obvious that they must be taken into account.We then see that although precisely similar products appear in an infinite variety of concrete processes,they correspond only to a part of those processes,and may always be analysed into identical elements.The effect can no more have two causes than a cause two effects,for cause and effect are distinguished by observing the same process in a different order.It was just because men of science held that the one effect must have one cause that they could make a coherent theory of heat.Mill,however goes a step further.Bacon's error was the assumption that there was only one 'form'of heat.Now it is specially futile,says Mill,to seek for the causes of 'sensible qualities of objects.In regard to scarcely any of them has it been found possible to trace any unity of cause.'Bacon,therefore,was seeking for 'what did not exist,'and to this Mill adds the surprising statement that 'the phenomenon of which he sought for the one cause has oftenest no cause at all,and,when it has,depends (as far as hitherto ascertained)on an unassignable variety of causes.'(74)To explain this rather startling assertion we must take one more of Mill's theories.How from the doctrine,which he fully admits,that every event has a cause can he reach the conclusion that some things have 'no cause at all'?Once more we have,Ithink,the misapplication of an undeniable truth.A 'law'of causation,taken by itself,will obviously not fully account for a single fact.It cannot lead to the conclusion:'this fact must exist,'but only to the conclusion:this fact must exist if certain previous facts existed.We somewhere assume an initial stage.However far back we can go,we may still repeat the question.Given a single state of facts and the 'laws of causation,'we can go indefinitely backwards or forwards in time.
同类推荐
热门推荐
每天学一点礼仪常识
划出版是立意于让更多的人打破学科壁垒,推广学科常识。常识能提升人的文化素养,改善一个人的文化形象。人文学科本来就没有很严格的区分,而掌握更多的学科常识对于我们成为一个有文化素养的人很有意义。这虽然未必是我们对知识分工所带来的局限作抗争,但不同的学科常识使我们更能成为一个丰富而有趣的人。这不免使我们想起培根先生那段著名的论述,“读史使人明智,读诗使人聪慧,演算使人精密,哲理使人深刻,伦理学使人有修养,逻辑修辞使人善辩。总之,知识能塑造人的性格。不仅如此,精神上的各种缺陷,都可以通过求知来改善--正如身体上的缺陷,可以通过运动来改善一样。这些话语所蕴涵的深刻含义,令人咀嚼不尽。悦读MOOK(第九卷)
本书将带你走进茫茫书海,我们将请一些学者和专家帮你指津,请一些书界人士为你剖析书坛风云,使你从中获得大量的图书信息,还能饱览各类书籍的精彩片段,一册在手,尽情享受读书的乐趣。