According to these remarks it is now easy to find the answer to the weighty question whether the notion of God is one belonging to physics (and therefore also to metaphysics, which contains the pure a priori principles of the former in their universal import) or to morals.If we have recourse to God as the Author of all things, in order to explain the arrangements of nature or its changes, this is at least not a physical explanation, and is a complete confession that our philosophy has come to an end, since we are obliged to assume something of which in itself we have otherwise no conception, in order to be able to frame a conception of the possibility of what we see before our eyes.Metaphysics, however, cannot enable us to attain by certain inference from the knowledge of this world to the conception of God and to the proof of His existence, for this reason, that in order to say that this world could be produced only by a God (according to the conception implied by this word) we should know this world as the most perfect whole possible; and for this purpose should also know all possible worlds (in order to be able to compare them with this); in other words, we should be omniscient.It is absolutely impossible, however, to know the existence of this Being from mere concepts, because every existential proposition, that is, every proposition that affirms the existence of a being of which Iframe a concept, is a synthetic proposition, that is, one by which Igo beyond that conception and affirm of it more than was thought in the conception itself; namely, that this concept in the understanding has an object corresponding to it outside the understanding, and this it is obviously impossible to elicit by any reasoning.There remains, therefore, only one single process possible for reason to attain this knowledge, namely, to start from the supreme principle of its pure practical use (which in every case is directed simply to the existence of something as a consequence of reason) and thus determine its object.Then its inevitable problem, namely, the necessary direction of the will to the summum bonum, discovers to us not only the necessity of assuming such a First Being in reference to the possibility of this good in the world, but, what is most remarkable, something which reason in its progress on the path of physical nature altogether failed to find, namely, an accurately defined conception of this First Being.As we can know only a small part of this world, and can still less compare it with all possible worlds, we may indeed from its order, design, and greatness, infer a wise, good, powerful, etc., Author of it, but not that He is all-wise, all-good, all-powerful, etc.It may indeed very well be granted that we should be justified in supplying this inevitable defect by a legitimate and reasonable hypothesis; namely, that when wisdom, goodness, etc, are displayed in all the parts that offer themselves to our nearer knowledge, it is just the same in all the rest, and that it would therefore be reasonable to ascribe all possible perfections to the Author of the world, but these are not strict logical inferences in which we can pride ourselves on our insight, but only permitted conclusions in which we may be indulged and which require further recommendation before we can make use of them.On the path of empirical inquiry then (physics), the conception of God remains always a conception of the perfection of the First Being not accurately enough determined to be held adequate to the conception of Deity.(With metaphysic in its transcendental part nothing whatever can be accomplished.)When I now try to test this conception by reference to the object of practical reason, I find that the moral principle admits as possible only the conception of an Author of the world possessed of the highest perfection.He must be omniscient, in order to know my conduct up to the inmost root of my mental state in all possible cases and into all future time; omnipotent, in order to allot to it its fitting consequences; similarly He must be omnipresent, eternal, etc.Thus the moral law, by means of the conception of the summum bonum as the object of a pure practical reason, determines the concept of the First Being as the Supreme Being; a thing which the physical (and in its higher development the metaphysical), in other words, the whole speculative course of reason, was unable to effect.The conception of God, then, is one that belongs originally not to physics, i.e., to speculative reason, but to morals.The same may be said of the other conceptions of reason of which we have treated above as postulates of it in its practical use.
同类推荐
热门推荐
tfboys之双角色之恋
两个完全不同的身份,一张一模一样的脸,两个完全不同的性格,却塑造出一颗爱他如初的心。千总的高冷在这里表现的淋漓尽致,想珍惜的时候却发现爱已经离开,千总的诚心悔过能否换回她的心?她说:我是一个自尊的人,而我却是用我的尊严去爱你。……再次见面也早已物是人非,她也早已不是她…EXO之这是我的女人
萌萌哒的女主,因为被父母给’买了‘遇见了12个花样不同但是占有欲都级极强丈夫。女主:我要喝奶茶!12只:买!女主:我要那件衣服!12只:买!。。。。12只:宝宝,满足了你这么多是不是?女主:额,我困了,先去睡觉了拜拜!鹿晗:宝宝,今天你别想跑!。。。。校园交通安全管理与教育
中小学生是社会未来的接班人,他们能否健康成长,关系到民族的兴衰和社会的进步。育人不仅要进行智力教育,还要进行道德、纪律教育。“十年树木,百年树人”,交通安全宣传教育工作要从学生抓起,使学生从小就接受交通安全知识教育,达到自己教育自己,自己管理自己,养成自觉遵守交通法规的良好习惯。