登陆注册
14812800000052

第52章 IMPEACHMENT REPORTED TO THE SENATE.(11)

And in answer to the eleventh article, this respondent denies that on the 18th day of August, in the year 1866, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, he did, by public speech or otherwise, declare or affirm, in substance or at all, that the thirty-ninth Congress of the United States was not a Congress of the United States authorized by the constitution to exercise legislative power under the same, or that he did then and there declare or affirm that the said thirty-ninth Congress was a Congress of only part of the States in any sense or meaning other than that ten States of the Union were denied representation therein; or that he made any or either of the declarations or affrmations in this behalf, in the said article alleged, as denying or intending to deny that the legislation of said thirty-ninth Congress was valid or obligatory upon this respondent, except so far as this respondent saw fit to approve the same; and as to the allegation in said article, that be did thereby intend or mean to be understood that the said Congress had not power to propose amendments to the Constitution, this respondent says that in said address he said nothing in reference to the subject of amendments of the Constitution. nor was the question of the competency of the said Congress to propose such amendments, without the participation of said excluded States. at the time of said address in any way mentioned or considered or referred to by this respondent. nor in what he did say had he any intent regarding the same, and he denies the allegation so made to the contrary thereof. But this respondent, in further answer to, and in respect of, the said allegations of the said eleventh article hereinbefore traversed and denied, claims and insists upon his personal and official right of freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, and his duty in his political relations as President of the United States to the people of the United States in the exercise of such freedom of opinion and freedom of speech, in the same manner, form and effect as he has in this behalf stated the same in his answer to the said tenth article, and with the same effect as if he here repeated the same; and he further claims and insists, as in said answer to said tenth article he has claimed and insisted, that he is not subject to question, inquisition, impeachment, or inculpation, in any form or manner, of or concerning such rights of freedom of opinion or freedom of speech or his alleged exercise thereof.

And this respondent further denies that on the 21st day of February, in the year 1868, or at any other time, at the City of Washington, in the District of Columbia, in pursuance of any such declaration as is in that behalf in said eleventh article alleged, or otherwise, he did unlawfully, and in disregard of the requirement of the Constitution that he should take care that the laws should be faithfully executed, attempt to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act regulating the tenure of certain civil offices," passed March 2, 1867, by unlawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means by which he should prevent Edwin M. Stanton from forthwith resuming the functions of Secretary for the Department of War, or by lawfully devising or contriving, or attempting to devise or contrive, means to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act making appropriations for the support of the army for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1868, and for other purposes,"approved March 2, 1867, or to prevent the execution of an act entitled "An act to provide for the more efficient government of the rebel States," passed March 2, 1867.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that he has, in his answer to the first article, set forth in detail the acts, steps, and proccedings done and taken by this respondent to and toward or in the matter of the suspension or removal of the said Edwin M. Stanton in or from the office of Secretary for the Department of War, with the times, modes, circumstances, intents, views, purposes, and opinions of official obligation and duty under and with which such acts, steps, and proceedings were done and taken; and he makes answer to this eleventh article of the matters in his answer to the first article, pertaining to the suspension or removal of said Edwin M.

Stanton, to the same intent and effect as if they were here repeated and set forth.

And this deponent, further answering the said eleventh article, denies that by means or reason of anything in said article alleged, this respondent, as President of the United States, did, on the 21st day of February, 1868, or at any other day or time.

commit, or that he was guilty of, a high misdemeanor in office.

And this respondent, further answering the said eleventh article, says that the same and the matters therein contained do not charge or allege the commission of any act whatever by this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, nor the omission by this respondent of any act of official obligation or duty in his office of President of the United States; nor does the said article nor the matters therein contained name designate, describe, or define any act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance, or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance or means, whereby this respondent can know or understand what act or mode or form of attempt, device, contrivance or means, or of attempt at device, contrivance, or means are imputed to or charged against this respondent, in his office of President of the United States, or intended so to be, or whereby this respondent can more fully or definitely make answer unto the said article than he hereby does.

And this respondent, in submitting to this honorable court this his answer to the articles of impeachment exhibited against him, respectfully reserves leave to amend and add to the same from time to time, as may become necessary or proper, and when and as such necessity and propriety shall appear.

Andrew Johnson Henry Stanbery, B. R. Curtis, Thomas A. R. Nelson, William M.

Evarts. W. S. Groesbeck. Of Counsel.

同类推荐
热门推荐
  • 溺宠,丫头你往哪逃

    溺宠,丫头你往哪逃

    她无意之中救了一个命悬一线的男人,他本想等着她长大再开始自己的行动,不想她已经有了自己相爱的人,并且一次次的忽视他,忘记他,这让他怎么甘心,终于忍无可忍,一手毁了她苦苦坚持的幸福,将她囚于身边,她恼过,哭过,逃过,然而冥冥之中也许已经注定。
  • 那年,你从我记忆中路过

    那年,你从我记忆中路过

    一次相遇,给两个人设下了缘分。一段虐恋,伤透了她的心为了逃避,她出国了。五年后,她强势归来……
  • 瓦罗兰之迷

    瓦罗兰之迷

    一个神秘的充满魔法与奥义的世界,一个充满战火的大陆。一位二十一世纪的青年接受召唤,来到了这个大陆开始了他的使命,拯救处于战火中的大陆,将迎接来自神灵的怒火,且看他是如何完成使命的。
  • 坐好月子健康一生

    坐好月子健康一生

    本书分上下两篇,上篇为妈妈篇,介绍其坐月子期间的保健知识,包括准备迎接新生宝宝、开始坐月子、坐月子饮食调理、月子里健康检查及防病、产后减肥与避孕;下篇为宝宝篇,介绍宝宝怎样能健康成长,包括了解新生儿的发育、新生儿喂养、新生儿的日常照料、新生儿常见疾病防治。
  • 武欲仙悲

    武欲仙悲

    第一次写小说,写的不好请提出来,谢谢....
  • 崛起与没落

    崛起与没落

    “我们的崛起,他们的没落”。从21世纪回到了20世纪,从现实进入了虚拟,这个世界既陌生而又熟悉。“身为中国人,理当手执中国剑,头顶中国魂,脚踏中国龙,身缠中国之气节,力创中国之荣耀。”在那里,刘迪看见了这么一两行字。
  • 福妻驾到

    福妻驾到

    现代饭店彪悍老板娘魂穿古代。不分是非的极品婆婆?三年未归生死不明的丈夫?心狠手辣的阴毒亲戚?贪婪而好色的地主老财?吃上顿没下顿的贫困宭境?不怕不怕,神仙相助,一技在手,天下我有!且看现代张悦娘,如何身带福气玩转古代,开面馆、收小弟、左纳财富,右傍美男,共绘幸福生活大好蓝图!!!!快本新书《天媒地聘》已经上架开始销售,只要3.99元即可将整本书抱回家,你还等什么哪,赶紧点击下面的直通车,享受乐乐精心为您准备的美食盛宴吧!)
  • 福妻驾到

    福妻驾到

    现代饭店彪悍老板娘魂穿古代。不分是非的极品婆婆?三年未归生死不明的丈夫?心狠手辣的阴毒亲戚?贪婪而好色的地主老财?吃上顿没下顿的贫困宭境?不怕不怕,神仙相助,一技在手,天下我有!且看现代张悦娘,如何身带福气玩转古代,开面馆、收小弟、左纳财富,右傍美男,共绘幸福生活大好蓝图!!!!快本新书《天媒地聘》已经上架开始销售,只要3.99元即可将整本书抱回家,你还等什么哪,赶紧点击下面的直通车,享受乐乐精心为您准备的美食盛宴吧!)
  • 死神之王城本纪

    死神之王城本纪

    路过的朋友们,大家都去新书《冥灵天辰》那看看啊!点点收藏,投投推荐啊!让我的新书NB一回啊!大家别往王城这点收藏了、投推荐了!都去《冥灵天辰》那吧,帮帮文飞啊!
  • 女总裁的猛男护卫

    女总裁的猛男护卫

    退役兵痞回到都市保护总裁未婚妻,可是不止一个未婚妻太爱他,还有精灵小丫头,泼辣美女,清纯女明星倒追他……形象违章的都滚开,只要漂亮的都到碗里来!当然,除了美女还有兄弟,带着一群狐朋狗友发展事业是少不了的,至于敌人?当然统统踩在脚下!且看一个兵痞如何在花花都市带着一群兄弟泡美女虐敌人,打造属于自己的另类帝国!